Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jakub Paul vs Arthur Reymond Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paul vs Reymond analysis and find out who is favored!
Jakub Paul vs Arthur Reymond Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paul 2 - 0 Reymond
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul has won 51.21% of points on their second serve, while Reymond has won 46.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul, in recent form, has won 58.19% of their opponent's second serve points, while Reymond has won 54.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.78% and 34.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul has saved 59.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Reymond has saved 51.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul has won 62.69% of matches played (W/L 42/ 25), with Reymond winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30). Reymond has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 87/ 67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.27% of matches (W/L 37/ 18), where as Reymond has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 9/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paul winning 2 times and Reymond being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Paul winning 4 and Reymond winning 1. The last match between Paul and Reymond was at the Troyes Challenger, 27-06-2022, Q3, Clay with Jakub Paul getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paul and Reymond have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paul winning 1 times and Reymond 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paul winning 0, and Reymond 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul has played against opponents with an average rank of 226.79 while Reymond has played against players with an average rank of 85.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Reymond has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul has converted 51.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Reymond has converted 45.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
516
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
876
Rank
520
High
25
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
54% (177-148)
Career Total W/L
54% (167-140)
59% (17-12)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$2,285
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jakub Paul | Arthur Reymond |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 28 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:49 | 1:45:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (104/169) | 53% (76/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (74/104) | 59% (45/76) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (28/65) | 40% (27/67) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (10/18) | 15% (3/20) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (71/143) | 40% (67/169) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Jakub Paul
Player
Arthur Reymond
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Arthur Reymond
59%
(
79 of
133)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
39%
(
21 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
43%
(
57 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
111
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jakub Paul | Arthur Reymond |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (17/12) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (38/29) | 52% (12/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (326/291) | 52% (111/101) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:20 | 1:24:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 249.14 | 87.7 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1324/1986) | 48% (281/582) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (829/1324) | 73% (206/281) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (333/662) | 47% (141/301) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (109/218) | 46% (27/59) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (879/2027) | 40% (231/571) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (12/8) | 50% (5/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (16/28) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 0% (5/0) |
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Rio Noguchi
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Alen Mujakic
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Jakub Paul
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
111)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Jakub Paul
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tristan Lamasine
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
81 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
0
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Jakub Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Arthur Reymond Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Arthur Reymond
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Evan Furness
42%
(
38 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
37%
(
19 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Aaron Gabet
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Arthur Reymond
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
38%
(
18 of
48)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Kokoro Isomura
44%
(
18 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Matthew William Donald
44%
(
31 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Arthur Reymond
80%
(
70 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Arthur Reymond
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
62)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tanguy Genier
Player
Arthur Reymond
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(10) 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Vs Reymond Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
